Was there ever a type of SRB that could run in any address space, picked "at 
random"? Or have they always been scheduled with a particular address space 
dispatched (selected by coder)? I have a vague memory of some dispatchable unit 
which could run in "some" address space, but which one was not deterministic. 
But maybe the memory is due to a faulty understanding on my part. Wouldn't be 
the first time. Won't be the last.

-- 
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
[email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Peter Relson
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 6:46 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Address of SRB rtn
> 
> The SRB itself (the control block) needs to be in common storage.
> The SRB routine needs to be addressable from wherever the machine will
> fetch instructions from when it is running (i.e., if it is running only
> with P=X, it can be in X).
> 
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to