On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:47:17 -0600, Anthony Fletcher <[email protected]> wrote:
>Any SYNCSORT users out there? We have one job that gets an S0C4-10. The >problem can be reproduced with a three line set of data, so its not a capacity >problem. There are two sort fields. If the second one's displacement is >reduced the problem goes away but it otherwise looks like an addressing >problem. The sort length plus displacement is nowhere near as long as the >LRECL of the data set. >The abend does not appear to be in any SYNCSORT module. >It is version 1.3.0 running on z/OS 1.13. >Waiting for vendor agent to get back. >Anyone experienced anything like this? > Did you recently upgrade to z/OS 1.13? Did you check with the vendor prior to your z/OS 1.13 upgrade to see what was supported and if any fixes were needed? I was already at 1.4 but I think 1.3 was supported as long as you had all the fixes, including some that are hardware related (z196). Even if this is a new problem, the vendor usually has a parm option as a work around until they come up with a fix. Mark -- Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS mailto:[email protected] Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
