Lizette, Is Setsys debug what you're looking for?
Setsys debug Enable exits to test Test function using exits Disable exits Setsys nodebug Release Hardcopy Examine activity logs for the effects of testing exits. No need for a second HSM. -----Original Message----- From: Lizette Koehler [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 10:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Multiple HSM in one LPAR ? Glenn, Is there any safe way to test HSM exits without having a TEST LPAR? So if I only had an LPAR but needed to validate my code for an HSM Exit, any way to do that safely? Or would it be safer to bring up a new sysres set with the exits? Or a new LPAR for testing? Thanks Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Glenn Wilcock > > No. You should not attempt to start two distinct HSMs within the same > LPAR. Multiple HSMs within the same LPAR are only supported when they > share the same control data sets and the secondary hosts are started > with the HOSTMODE=AUX parameter. A good example of why you can't have > distinct HSMs is Recall. HSM intercepts Open requests for migrated > data sets and recalls them. You can't have two distinct HSMs fighting > over a Recall. That is just one issue of many (serialization on > functions & data sets, other intercepts, etc) > > Glenn Wilcock > DFSMShsm Architect > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
