Thanks for the tip. I will try out your suggestion.
________________________________ From: John Dawes <[email protected]> To: willie bunter <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 7:47:15 AM Subject: Fw: DFHSM - ARC6030I - CAUSES ABARS TASKS TO BE HELD ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: retired mainframer <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, 14 December 2012 2:56 PM Subject: Re: DFHSM - ARC6030I - CAUSES ABARS TASKS TO BE HELD Holding aggregate backup is exactly what the description of ARC6027I says should happen. Wouldn't it be better if you used the HSM CANCEL REQUEST(xx) command rather than the MVS CANCEL jobname command? :>: -----Original Message----- :>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On :>: Behalf Of willie bunter :>: Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 5:31 AM :>: To: [email protected] :>: Subject: DFHSM - ARC6030I - CAUSES ABARS TASKS TO BE HELD :>: :>: Good Day Members, :>: :>: I have noticed that when cancelling an ABARS task which is not active :>: casued HSM to hold ALL ABARS backups. Is this a bug with HSM or is HSM :>: doing what it is supposed to do? I would appreciate your :>: thoughts. Below is the output from the SYSLOG. :>: :>: C ABAR0146,A=0120 :>: IEE341I ABAR0146 NOT ACTIVE IN SPECIFIED ADDRESS SPACE :>: ARC6027I DFSMSHSM PRIMARY ADDRESS SPACE ISSUED 'C 441 :>: ARC6027I (CONT.) ABAR0146,A=0120' TO CANCEL A SECONDARY ADDRESS SPACE. :>: ARC6027I (CONT.) AGGREGATE BACKUP IS HELD ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
