John Gilmore wrote:
An obvious question: What language is the routine you are examining written in? 
P00236 and that ilk look like compiler-generated labels.

Excellent point, and one I should have mentioned. It's mostly C (Dignus C), 
with some assembler. And some open source components, also in C.

However, as of a few seconds ago (i.e., I hadn't thought of it!), I searched 
all the libraries that are getting included in the load module, and find that 
string in none of them. I also searched the load library, just in case it was 
getting dragged in somehow in a way that I hadn't expected, and didn't find it 
there, either.

So while I loved your suggestion and smacked myself upside the head when I saw 
it, it turns out to not be trenchant, it appears. Now my head and hand hurt for 
no reason! :(

Seriously, keep those ideas comin'...

...phsiii

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to