Yeah Bob, I feel like Mark, I would just do the rewrite unless your up against 
timeframe ...then it's a much different story. The against I aren't anything 
since Rexx hit the scene on VM and then MVS.

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com

Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll 
understand. - Chinese Proverb


On Dec 28, 2012, at 10:14 AM, Mark Zelden <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:35:58 -0500, Richards, Robert B. 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> It turns out that the CBT version had the same problem, so the issue at hand 
>> is "what the heck is unique in that clist"?  :-)
>> 
>> It is not critical that it be converted. I just wanted to. If/when time 
>> permits, I'll look into it further.
>> 
>> Regardless, thanks to all.
>> 
>> Bob
>> 
> 
> Just do it!   We don't need no stinkin' converters. ;-)   Never used one nor 
> tried to. Unless
> there is a lot of PROC support needed it isn't difficult assuming you know 
> some rexx, which
> I know you do.   (and there is are some PROC routinges floating around out 
> there).
> 
> BTW, Happy New Year Bob.
> 
> Mark
> --
> Mark Zelden - Zelden Consulting Services - z/OS, OS/390 and MVS       
> mailto:[email protected]                                        
> Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html 
> Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to