<snippage> >There seems to be a misunderstanding here.
Indeed! Scott Ford ( and me and perhaps the rest of the planet too :-D ) was wishing (with a sore heart) just like the OP for such a syntax check similar to the JCL TYPRUN statement. >The OP asked about JES parms (init deck) and everybody is 'solving' JCL issues. 8-D I was wondering how far this thread would go until the correct solution appears or someone tries to correct this thread... <SNIPPAGE> I believe someone suggested a secondary JES2 for parm and exit checking/testing. And that was several posts ago. So I thought enough said. However, as someone else pointed out, if you can get TYPRUN=SCAN to work against a JES2PARM member.... Regards, Steve Thompson IS BUILD group ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
