Allan Staller writes: >It was my impression that the IBM JVM was a port directly from >SUN (now ORACLE). I am not sure whether IBM or SUN/ORACLE was >doing the porting.
"Direct port" is not a fair description, no. I guess that information was just revealed if you weren't aware of it. :-) "Conforming implementation," yes. >In many of the issues I have been involved in, the SUN/ORACLE web >documentation was perfectly applicable to the IBM JVM. That's because IBM Java is a (very popular) conforming implementation. There's comparatively little implementation-specific documentation because that's rather the point of Java (and its specifications). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy Sipples Consulting Enterprise IT Architect (Based in Singapore) E-Mail: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
