On 3 February 2013 22:30, zMan <[email protected]> wrote: >> Trademarks: ZPDT, Formalized, 1606983 >> Trademarks: ZPDT, Abandoned - Section 40(3), 1457751 >> Trademarks: Z/ARCHITECTURE, Registered, 1081337, TMA626616 >> Trademarks: Z/VM, Registered, 1081333, TMA569513 >> Trademarks: Z9, Registered, 1278666, TMA684003 >> Trademarks: ZENTERPRISE, Advertised, 1491205 >> Trademarks: SYSTEM Z10, Registered, 1375594, TMA741679 >> Trademarks: SYSTEM Z, Registered, 1292849, TMA704078 >> Trademarks: ZSERIES, Registered, 1081332, TMA575752 >> Trademarks: z/VSE, Registered, 1198808, TMA677185
> VERY interesting, thanks. Among other details, it makes it clear that case > is irrelevant in trademarks. I believe case can be relevant if it's part of a logo or wordmark. For instance, the abandoned RIM "Budgie" trademark has a drawing of a budgie associated with it, and they disclaim use of the word budgie alone. And I just noticed that RIM has a product called Blackberry MVS. Unfortunately it's Mobile Voice System. Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
