Thomas,

I see your point ...writing in Cobol , because I must to support a product, I 
have used a bunch of assembler routines, we are converting to C

Scott ford
www.identityforge.com

Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll 
understand. - Chinese Proverb


On Feb 17, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Thomas Berg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Some suggestions: 
> 
> * GO TO's from in the middle of one SECTION into the middle of another.  And 
> then GO TO back again depending on a "switch"...
> * Programs with nested PERFORMS (*only* PERFORMS!) in maybe 7 levels ending 
> in a CALL of another module.
> * Field name (variable) in (e g) MOVE statement qualified resulting in more 
> than 100 characters, then add the matching length for the corresponding 
> field. 
>  (Take this times 1000 fields...)
> * Processing the same data sometimes in a character defined field, sometimes 
> in numeric defined fields (several different numeric formats for the same 
> data) without any reasonable explanation. 
> * Need to check four or five different result fields (depending on the 
> situation etc.) for eventual error from the CALL of another module. 
> 
> And other I have forgotten...
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> Thomas Berg
> ________________________________________________________________
> Thomas Berg   Specialist   z/OS/IT Delivery   SWEDBANK AB (Publ)
> 
>> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]]
>> För Scott Ford
>> Skickat: den 16 februari 2013 21:26
>> Till: [email protected]
>> Ämne: Re: SV: Article for the boss: COBOL will outlive us all
>> 
>> Thomas,
>> 
>> I don't follow, writing in several languages , what awkward to do in
>> cobol, supervisory stuff yes for sure.
>> 
>> Scott ford
>> www.identityforge.com
>> 
>> Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and
>> I'll understand. - Chinese Proverb
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 16, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Thomas Berg <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>>>> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
>> [email protected]]
>>>> För John Gilmore
>>>> Skickat: den 16 februari 2013 20:25
>>>> Till: [email protected]
>>>> Ämne: Re: Article for the boss: COBOL will outlive us all
>>>> 
>>>> Tony H wrote
>>>> 
>>>> | Now back to our regular COBOL, uh,  programming.
>>>> 
>>>> thus alluding to how many of us view of the language.
>>>> 
>>>> Over a now long career I never took COBOL seriously.  I was aware of
>>>> it, and I even learned to write it by helping COBOL programmers with
>>>> their problems.  It is a verbose but finally very simple language.
>>>> That said, I could not, and did not, think much of a language
>> without
>>>> real storage management, strings, pointers, booleans, etc., etc.  It
>>>> was move-oriented, compile-time bound, and synchronous, and I find
>>>> these characteristics despicable.
>>> 
>>> COBOL is certainly not a programmers language. It's very restricted
>> by its syntax and functionality and is often very clumsy to use.
>>> But that is also a feature: it's hard to obfuscate - which can be
>> seen as an asset from the point of maintenance and security.
>>> (Which do not mean that you can't make unintelligible programs - I
>> have seen many - but not at the lowest level.)
>>> It's also helpful when you need to understand the underlying data
>> structure the program is based on.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Thomas Berg
>>> ________________________________________________________________
>>> Thomas Berg   Specialist   z/OS/IT Delivery   SWEDBANK AB (Publ)
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
>> email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to