In my case, it  was and is long stable FTPS jobs using standard files and no 
knowledgeable staff with time to refit to stfp.
 About a decade ago, I experimented with the idea of wrapping a PROC around the 
whole process.  Ran out of available time to solve all issues.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 1:36 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: How is Passive FTP with TLS and NAT supposed to work?
> 
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:21:47 +0000, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> 
> >Aside from, I think this is still true, absent Dovetail extensions, the
> >requirement that SFTP only works with ZFS/HFS files
> >>
> What's the intended recipient?  If desktop or Open Systems, zFS/HFS should
> be acceptable.  If z/OS, cumbersomely flatten with TRSMAIN or TSO
> TRANSMIT; copy to zFS and SFTP.
> 
> >> There are other things, I'm sure I'm forgetting.  Switch to SFTP, and
> >> life gets much easier--most of the time.
> 
> There's some echo here of the "retire mainframe" thread.  z/OS doesn't
> "play well with others."
> 
> -- gil
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
> lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to