In my case, it was and is long stable FTPS jobs using standard files and no knowledgeable staff with time to refit to stfp. About a decade ago, I experimented with the idea of wrapping a PROC around the whole process. Ran out of available time to solve all issues. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 1:36 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: How is Passive FTP with TLS and NAT supposed to work? > > On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:21:47 +0000, Gibney, Dave wrote: > > >Aside from, I think this is still true, absent Dovetail extensions, the > >requirement that SFTP only works with ZFS/HFS files > >> > What's the intended recipient? If desktop or Open Systems, zFS/HFS should > be acceptable. If z/OS, cumbersomely flatten with TRSMAIN or TSO > TRANSMIT; copy to zFS and SFTP. > > >> There are other things, I'm sure I'm forgetting. Switch to SFTP, and > >> life gets much easier--most of the time. > > There's some echo here of the "retire mainframe" thread. z/OS doesn't > "play well with others." > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN