Going to to try it now but it seems logical that the system updates it ( the relative number after the dataset is unallocated ) As from what I remember in multi step job Where the GDG is explicitly allocated the GDG number gets updates only after completion of the entire job
Thanks > On Jun 21, 2020, at 5:56 AM, Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> > wrote: > > On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 01:02:41 -0400 Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > :>I am doing a number of snapx type dumps in a started task. I would like to > :>keep each and every one in a separate dsn. It would seem keeping them in a > :>GDG would accomplish this. > > :>The Documentation says that If I turn on S99GDGNT in S99FLAG1 I could > :>specify the dsn as MYSDUMP.GDG(+1) and have each snap dump in a separate > :>providing I do a close un allocate as a text unit (meaning I would > :>unallocated the dataset upon closing the snap file). > > :>If I read documentation right it seems that upon a close unallocate the > :>relative gag number gets updated > > It would seem to not require any free. Why haven't you tried it? > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> > http://www.dissensoftware.com > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
