It's common for IBM to release multiple fixing PTFs for a single APAR, where 
the PTFs address essentially the same problem/function in multiple releases. 
This is often the case when two or more PTFs are close in numerical sequence. 

The best answer is found in IBM ServiceLink function SIS, which in this case 
states that UI69028 Is superceded by UI69029. However displaying UI69028 In 
SMP/E should clearly show that it is superceded. So the answer to the question, 
is UI69028 installed, the answer is Yes, it's installed/superceded. Whether 
UI69028 was ever actually installed is not germane because SMP/E will generally 
bypass installing a superceded PTF in a single APPLY if both PTFs are 
available. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 7:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: [External] MEPL showing the latest PTF

CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL

Bill,

If UI70029 supercedes UI69028, then yes, the code correction in UI69028 is 
included.

Rex

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [External] MEPL showing the latest PTF

If I want to know if a given PTF is applied to a specific module, such as 
UI69028, but I see UI70029. Does that mean prior PTFs are included?
thanks
Bill


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to