One colleague told me that they have "marked" WLM managed (IRD) in some LPARs, but they don't have Parallel Sysplex, so they didn't defined the SYSZWLM_xxxxxxxx CF structure.
Is this possible? If yes, what functions are proccessed? 2013/2/27 Evren O Baran <[email protected]> > Also please note that IRD LPAR weight management continues to work with > HiperDispatch turned ON. > For instance as the LPAR weight changes the LPAR guaranteed share changes > as well and HiperDispatch will adjust the number of high/med/low CPs... > etc accordingly. > > > Oz > > System z Platform Evaluation Test - zPET > www.ibm.com/systems/services/platformtest/servers/systemz.html > > > > From: Horst Sinram <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], > Date: 02/27/2013 06:54 AM > Subject: Re: WLM Intelligent Resource Director (was Defined > capacity) > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> > > > > > Now we know, that Hiperdispatch also disables fundamental IRD > functionality. > > That statement is not correct: > - HiperDispatch *replaces* Vary CPU Management (and only when > HiperDispatch=YES.) > - HiperDispatch provides *more* functionality and is much more efficient > and faster than the old Vary CPU Management such that there is no reason > why one would want to continue with the old management in a HD=YES > environment > > Horst Sinram - z/OS Workload Management > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Un saludo. Álvaro Guirao ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
