On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:19:47 -0400, Joseph Reichman wrote:

>I don’t know if I would find the space 
>I work for the IRS have to get ready filing season 2021 
>Looking for data in filing season 2020
>
>Huge amounts of DASD
> 
Lizette's pseudocode appears to show that she means
the *names* of the datasets, not their content.  They'd
be opened one-by-one and processed in place.

My pseudocode vaguely resembled Rexx; any language would do.


>> On Oct 1, 2020, at 5:16 PM, Lizette Koehler  wrote:
>> 
>> Why not put all datasets in a sequential file.  Which is then used as input 
>> to your process
>> 
>> Then your process could do
>> 
>> Read input list of files
>> Do Loop until Input all read
>>   Open file
>>    Search file
>>   If match - do Something
>>   Close file
>> End loop
>> 
>> Keep going through as many datasets that are in your input file.  Or is this 
>> something you are doing already?


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joseph Reichman
>> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 1:59 PM
>> 
>> You may be right 
>> Was doing it in assembler 
>> Because that’s the language used 
>> 
>> But whatever works 
>> 
>> PS my code was proceeded by a call IGGCSI00 to get the dataset names 
>> 
>>>> On Oct 1, 2020, at 4:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote
>>>
>>> Does a concatenation gain you anything compared to the simple:
>>> 
>>> DO FOR 4471
>>>   ALLOCATE
>>>       OPEN
>>>           look for data
>>>       CLOSE
>>>   FREE
>>> END

-- gil

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to