What are the maximum block sizes of the two different device types?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.adru000/r2259.htm
If the source tape has actual blocks bigger than the maximum blocksize
of the destination tape, it cannot be copied.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 2:52 AM (K.K.Paradox)T.Kobayashi
<kobaya...@paradox.jp> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are migrating data from 3592 to VTL.
> The 3592 and VTL are both defined on the Mainframe as 3590 device.
> The 3592 tape media has IDCAMS REPRO and DFDSS DUMP datasets.
>
> The REPRO dataset could be copied and moved to VTL.
> But, DFDSS DUMP datasets copy failed with copydump.
>
> *IEF233A M 0A01,FISVO1,,RD0601GJ,STEP001,USBACKUP
> *IEF233A M 0A13,REN801,,RD0601GJ,STEP001,USBACKUP
>  IEC141I 013-68,IFG0196L,RD0601GJ,STEP001,OUT1,0A13,REN801,  691
>  IEC149I 813-04,IFG0195H,RD0601GJ,STEP001,OUT1,0A13,REN801,  692
>
> - COPYDUMP -
> 00080001
>    INDD(IN1) /* DUMP TAPE TO BE COPIED */ -
> 00090001
>    OUTDD(OUT1) /* NEW DUMP TAPE */
> 00091001
>  ADR101I (R/I)-RI01 (01), TASKID 001 HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO COMMAND 'COPYDUMP
> '
>  ADR109I (R/I)-RI01 (01), 2020.293 09:46:53 INITIAL SCAN OF USER CONTROL
> STATEMENTS COMPLETED
>  ADR016I (001)-PRIME(01), RACF LOGGING OPTION IN EFFECT FOR THIS TASK
> 0ADR006I (001)-STEND(01), 2020.293 09:46:53 EXECUTION BEGINS
> 0ADR049E (001)-STEND(01), 2020.293 10:01:04 DFSMSDSS FUNCTION TASK ABEND
> RECOVERY ROUTINE WAS ENTERED. SYSTEM ABEND CODE=0013 REASON
>                           CODE=0068
> 0ADR006I (001)-STEND(02), 2020.293 10:01:04 EXECUTION ENDS
> 0ADR013I (001)-CLTSK(01), 2020.293 10:01:04 TASK COMPLETED WITH RETURN CODE
> 0008
> 0ADR012I (SCH)-DSSU (01), 2020.293 10:01:04 DFSMSDSS PROCESSING COMPLETE.
> HIGHEST RETURN CODE IS 0008 FROM:
>                           TASK    001
>
> The 3592 is Medea Type 7 and the VTL is Media Type 3.
> It seems that this error is occurring so as not to allow copying to smaller
> capacity media.
> However, VTL is a virtual tape with unlimited media size capacity.
> Restore from 3592 and re-dump to VTL is a lot of work, so we want to avoid
> this.
>
> Is there a way around this error?
>
> Best regards,
> Toyokazu Kobayashi
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to