Peter Relson wrote, in part: >However the thing that seems to be getting lost here is that the DB2 >sample is simply incorrect and should not have the extra quotes. They >don't want an extra quote in the generated code any more than you do. Tell >them to fix it. And don't accept a simple "no" for an answer. It would >probably be nice to accept a FIN. And if they don't choose to change the >sample, then they must document the restrictions on the lengths of >SYSPARMs that "work" (such documentation would be pretty silly and take >longer to figure out than changing the sample). I suspect they'll be >pretty happy to fix the sample in a future release.
>It appears that no one vocal enough to ask has needed the function in the >lifetime of the SAVE macro. Needs can certainly change. But have they, in >this case? Well, I’d happily APAR it if I could. As a vendor using IBM DTSC, I have no APAR ability (though I’m sure some folks would consider ME APARable, hence I do have “APARability”!). Anyone want to volunteer? Peter, you can’t open a cross-product PMR? …phsiii ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
