> That said, there may have been (and may still be) *performance-related* > reasons for using similar sized paged data sets. >Capacity planning and system tuning of that nature is not my area of >expertise.
I was always taught from the performance related side to keep them the same size. I see your point regarding functionality. Unfortunately, functioning and performing are some/many times walking in different directions. But, they are converging in z/OS, more every year. I think the two best things in the last 15 are WLM & PAV! - Ted MacNEIL [email protected] Twitter: @TedMacNEIL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
