[Default] On 1 Jan 2021 07:37:00 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main [email protected] (Charles Mills) wrote:
>I am trying to recall. I think SMF 17 may be written for non-VSAM as well as >VSAM. The doc (V2R1 is what I happen to have open) says "Record type 17 is >written when a non-temporary DASD data set or a temporary DASD data set is >scratched." Would not seem to exclude VSAM. Type 17 is non-VSAM only. I think that type 65 is VSAM related only. The type 42s are after my active time but they may be of help. Clark Morris > >In my experience, the most frequent cause of "how come I don't see an SMF xx >record for such-and-such?" is the convoluted logic of SMFPRMxx TYPE/NOTYPE >SYS/SUBSYS logic. Do a D SMF,O and look very, very carefully at the output. It >sometimes turns out that at some point in history lost in the mists of time >someone said "we are filling up SMF with 65's from TSO" or some such logic and >turned SMF type 65 off for TSO. > >Charles > > >-----Original Message----- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >Behalf Of Jasi Grewal >Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 7:16 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: SMF Type65 - Determine who Deleted the Dataset > >Charles Thank You for taking the time to respond on New Year Eve and >unfortunately, the datasets in question are VSAM Datasets and would I see the >information for that. >Happy New Year to You and to All! >Regards, >Jasi G. > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
