There should be a reason code
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ceea900/cs00015.htm.
I agree that most of the time the CEEDUMP is enough for diagnosis. If I
need to go deeper I use IBM Fault Analyzer which has a really good UI.
Last resort is IPCS
if I need to read the systrace. IPCS is super powerful but it could do
with a new UI.
On 14/01/2021 12:57 am, Charles Mills wrote:
Thx.
Found it the old-fashioned with just good ol' debugging.
Buffer overrun :-( so who knows what I may have been clobbering.
Would be nice if LE put out a message to say exactly what its problem was (its
problem that caused it to abandon CEEDUMP).
Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of David Crayford
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 7:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why LE taking Transaction Dump rather than CEEDUMP?
In my experience this is because LE can't produce a CEEDUMP because a
recursive condition is detected. Usually save area chains have been
overwritten.
This may be one of those cases where TRAP(OFF) may be better so you can
get a dump without LE getting in the way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
