Thanks for catching that omission Peter. I wish I could edit my post... instead I'll just reposting that paragraph in hopes it's less confusing for anyone looking at the archives:
The binder will simply discard the "private code" (unnamed) CSECT (section), if it has no text. It never gets incorporated into the module being bound, so it should have no effect on it. Binder has behaved like this since near the beginning (early 90's, around when PM3 format was introduced). On Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: > Reply > > >The binder will simply discard the "private code" (unnamed) CSECT > (section), if it has text. > I suspect that Barry inadvertently omitted the word "no" before "text". > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
