Data is not there after check
> On Mar 19, 2021, at 3:57 PM, Paul Gilmartin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:43:38 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote: > >>> On 3/19/2021 12:35 PM, Joseph Reichman wrote: >>> So this is what I will do >>> >>> I’ll do 3 reads in the first since i need to get myself going I’ll issue the >>> WAIT using the ECB from the DECB >>> Than when I finish processing that buffer and need to go to the second I/O >>> I’ll issue a WAIT for that >>> etc >> >> Don't forget to issue CHECK after WAIT. >> > Is there any reason to do a WAIT before the CHECK? I never did. > > There's little reason to use BSAM. The consensus in this thread > has been, QSAM is at least nearly as good as BSAM; perhaps > better because it knows the best way to deal with current > devices, when to WAIT, etc. And has far less coding effort. > > GET LOCATE might save a few instructions/record vis-a-vis > GET MOVE. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
