Mark,
Thats probably part of a dynamic concatenation that SMP/E did for a SYSLIB sort
of a input DD name. Is the DDDEF part of a concatenation similar to this?:
DDNAME DDDEFNAM SMPDDNAM TYPE -----------------------DATA SET OR
PATH-----------------------
SMP00048
SCEEOBJ SMP00048 PERM SYS1.SCEEOBJ
Z22RSB 3390 SHR
SCEELKEX SMP00049 PERM SYS1.SCEELKEX
Z22RSB 3390 SHR
SCEELKED SMP00050 PERM SYS1.SCEELKED
Z22RSB 3390 SHR
CSSLIB SMP00051 PERM SYS1.CSSLIB
Z22RSB 3390 SHR
SEUVFLIB SMP00052 PERM SYS1.SEUVFLIB
Z22RSB 3390 SHR
Dana
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:43:02 +0000, Mark Jacobs <[email protected]>
wrote:
>I'm running an apply check with dataset overrides, same DSN, different volume.
>Here's one example.
>//CSSLIB DD DISP=SHR,UNIT=3390,VOL=SER=Z24AM1,DSN=SYS1.CSSLIB
>
>The SM APPLY CHECK FILE ALLOCATION REPORT shows that my override is being
>used,
>SYS1.CSSLIB Z24AM1 SHR
>
>But in the dynamic allocation processes, it's showing the volume specified in
>the DDDEF, not the one specified in my override.
>
>CSSLIB SMP00004 PERM SYS1.CSSLIB Z24A01
>
>is this a concern?
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
