I once worked with a shop that had a similar exit--similar intent anyway--in 
order to guide a user into following password rules. There are inherent 
problems with such an exit. First is the difficulty of writing directly to a 
3270 screen from a RACF exit. Regular mainframe maintenance has a way of hosing 
up the exit code, which has to be debugged and modified.

Another problem is more subtle. If an intruder were trying to break in to a 
mainframe system, such an exit might provide unwitting assistance. I think the 
strategy is to give as little information as possible about logon failures. 

Finally, is such an exit even needed? Modern native RACF password rules are 
pretty sophisticated. Unless a shop has some very unusual password rules, it's 
probably best to let RACF detect violations and issue appropriate messages. 

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler 
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 6:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: (External):Re: ICHPWX01 password exit source circa 1993

*** EXTERNAL EMAIL - Use caution when opening links or attachments ***

> I'll probably just take it out

There is no harm in doing so, provided (a..) your RACF SETROPTS PASSWORD RULES 
fully express the limits you wish to enforce; and (b.) your auditors are 
content with that.

No user is going to be discombobulated because a password that used to fail 
your exit no longer does.

Unless I am missing something (which someone will surely point out).

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Richard Pace
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: ICHPWX01 password exit source circa 1993

Our system (z/OS 2.4) is running with an old RACF password exit, ICHPWX01, 
assembly date 01/11/93.
Eyecatcher looks like this: ICHPWX01 E9202  01/11/93 16.25 RACF 1.9

We don't have the source code, and it's abending on our z/OS 2.4 system.
I'll probably just take it out; it's long past its usefulness.

But I was curious about its provenance and thought I'd check here if anyone 
recognizes it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to