Hello all,
Gotten pass change/replace issue, now encountering S0C4 issue in a 1993 
sub-pgm3.
How many more incompatible sub-pgms will be required to satisfy vender call 
routines modification?
Thus, kicking issue back to vender. 
Thx for all help.


> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:37:45 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: iewl syslin
> To: [email protected]
> 
> In <[email protected]>, on 03/10/2013
>    at 09:02 PM, chin ben <[email protected]> said:
> 
> >subpgm    SD   1E360    8448
> 
> That's a CSECT.
> 
> >IEW2322I 1220  4    CHANGE 
> >SUBPGM(SUBPGM)  <- replace with 2011 
> 
>  5.1.2  Placement of control statements
> 
>    Unless the -IMMED option is specified, the control statement
>    (such as CHANGE or REPLACE) used to specify an editing service
>    must immediately precede either the module to be modified or the
>    INCLUDE statement that specifies the module. If an INCLUDE
>    statement specifies several modules, the CHANGE or REPLACE
>    statement applies only to the first module included.
> 
> Also, the old and new names are the same.
> 
>     INCLUDE OBJECT
>     REPLACE subpgm
>     INCLUDE SYSLIB(OLDPGM)
>     REPLACE program1
>     INCLUDE SYSLIB(NEWPGM)
> 
> will let oldpgm  call the version of subpgm from newpgm without
> dragging in program1 from newpgm. Is that what you're trying to do?
> 
> -- 
>      Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>      Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
                                          
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to