Did you read the doc? They are concerned because 77A0 will character compare low to 7790 and mess up peoples' logic. Seems to me if you do character compares on hex data you get what you deserve, but I don't make up the rules.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom Conley Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 11:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z/OS SYSVAR looks weird On 6/21/2021 12:50 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote: > Hey all, > > Running z/OS 2.4 with RACF 2.4 - FMID HRF77C0. When I do a SYSVAR of > SYSLRACF, I get a result of RACF version is 7791. Is this right or is the > SYSVAR giving me outdated information? It just doesn't look correct. It's > also giving me a SYSTSOE version of 4040 which looks suspiciously like > spaces, but my primary question is about the RACF version. > > Thanks, > > Rex > > Rex, Please open a case to fix SYSLRACF and SYSTSOE. Those variables should display the correct version information for RACF and TSO. Regards, Tom Conley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
