If you are considering new variables, how about a version date
yyyymmdd updated when a significant incompatibility is introduced, a
release date yyyymmdd updated when a significant compatible version is
release, a modification date yyyymmdd when a minor compatible update
is released, and a patch date yyyymmdd indicating the latest
compatible vendor patch is applied.

On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:20 AM Seymour J Metz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> How about a new symbol that has the desired comparison properties?
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ________________________________________
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of 
> Peter Relson [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 9:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: z/OS SYSVAR looks weird
>
> Charles' interpretation is exactly the use case we are concerned with. The
> doc is not ASCII-oriented. It is EBCDIC-oriented. That use case,
> analogously, is why we continue to update CVTPRODN with a value that is
> not necessarily "obvious" but has the necessary characteristic of
> increasing (we even found that, for compatibility, we had to maintain the
> format of SPx.y.z).
>
> At the minimum, the &SYSLRACF doc will have to be changed. It clearly no
> longer is the RACF level). The comment on RCVTVRMN (which is documented
> properly as the source for &SYSLRACF) describes this situation. In all
> supported releases (and started in z/OS 2.2), there is no reason to use
> &SYSLRACF because it is known to correspond to the z/OS release (although
> that comment should refer to the ECVT not CVT). If someone is simply
> displaying &SYSLRACF, there is no benefit to doing so. You should display
> the value that is provided in ECVTPNAM / ECVTPVER / ECVTPREL / ECVTPMOD.
>
> But what I don't know is if there is some REXX sysvar that surfaces that
> ECVT info. Without that, the functionality is lacking.
> With a more complicated approach, a REXX exec can get that information
> from the ECVT but that doesn't strike me as "nice".
>
> We might explore "unfreezing" this in a way that keeps the value
> increasing for comparison purposes.
>
> Peter Relson
> z/OS Core Technology Design
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to