On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:08:03 +0800, David Crayford wrote: >On 19/03/2013 9:01 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:49:00 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote: >>> I'm just curious. Why do you need to ATTACH the program >>> if it is not to run asynchronously? >>> >> Doesn't task termination automatically free some resources that >> the programmer would need to free specifically after a LINK? > >Also if the attached program abends it doesn't sink the entire ship. > I suspect that can be covered with an ESTAE in either case. But it's easier with ATTACH.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
