On Sep 22, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Mitch Mccluhan 
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I would suggest IWS from IBM.  It is a true enterprise wide solution.  I have 
> been in the scheduler, production control, operations, etc areas for many 
> decades and it is, in my opinion, a better option.
> And in openness, I am with IBM, but this is my personal opinion.

If we’re suggesting alternatives: several years ago we were looking at this 
class of product and went with Stonebranch Universal Automation Controller. 
We’ve been quite pleased with it.

My openness declaration is that I’m a happy user, nothing more. And I’ve never 
used the other alternatives, so I don’t really have any experience to use as a 
comparison.


-- 
Pew, Curtis G
[email protected]






----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to