On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 09:30:43 +0100, Martin Packer wrote: >I'm not familiar with FANOUT but if it writes a record to, say, two >destinations, it's got to copy one of them. > It could be deferred; Copy-on-Write, optimizing for what Hobart earlier calledd the "typical case" of stages that don't modify the data. But incurring the complexity of a responsibility count.
>From: "Hobart Spitz" >Date: 23/09/2021 04:18 > >> I'm guessing the atypical case is a stage such as FANOUT which >> necessarily copies the data. > >Not sure what you mean by atypical. > I apologize; I trimmed your earlier mention of "typical case". -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
