On 9/28/2021 8:17 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Ed Jaffe wrote:
I meant to say there was _no defense_ that could be used by IBM against
the rationale presented in the requirement.
Ok, then what you said indeed wasn't what you intended to say, as I suspected!
Just checkin', thanks.
("indefensible argument" means "the argument is easily attacked and cannot be defended",
not "cannot be defended *against*")
Indeed.
I realized my grammatical mistake after the post was already out there,
but assumed readers would understand my meaning without the need for
follow-up clarification.
Obviously, I ASSuMEd incorrectly... 😕
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
