On 28/10/2021 1:23 am, Seymour J Metz wrote:
I would be happier if IBM clarified the status of OSS. I would also be much
happier if IBM either explicitly allowed the use of ZSNT for developing OSS or
offered an additional, possibly more expensive, option for which developeing
OSS software was allowed but for which developing proprietary software was not.
I'm not sure that this is the correct distinction. Where would you place
e.g. Rocket, with their open source development?
I still think there is a difference between "development" and a
"development environment" and non-commercial contributions to open
source software don't necessarily create a development environment.
--
Andrew Rowley
Black Hill Software
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
