Shmuel wrote: >No, if challenged you need a citation with claims about colloquial usage.
And IBM-MAIN posts aren't sufficient? Why not? That's pretty darned colloquial! (Yes, I feel like we're going in circles here, but it's not your fault or mine--it's that this requirement, while well-intentioned, seems to miss something!) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
