On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 08:04:56 -0600, Dave Jousma <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>Jake,
>
>Is that an APARfix for PH38318?   I see the APAR is still open.   Could be a 
>packaging error by IBM too…..
>
>
>I look up the same module in my 2.4 environment
>
>  Entry Type:  HFS                                      Zone Name: MVSTZN 
>  Entry Name:  EZAMLCAT                                 Zone Type: TARGET 
>                                                                          
>  FMID    : HIP6240       DISTLIB : AEZAXLT3 LASTUPD: HIP6240  TYPE=ADD   
>  RMID    : UI66498       SYSLIB  : SEZAMMSC BINARY                       
>  SHSCRIPT:                                                               
>                                                                          
>          ----------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                                          
> LINK     '../ezamlcat.cat'                                               
> PARM     PATHMODE(0,6,4,4)                                               
> SYMLINK  '../../../../../../../../usr/lib/nls/msg/C/ezamlcat.cat'        
> SYMPATH  '../../../../../usr/lpp/tcpip/lib/nls/msg/C/ezamlcat.cat'       
>
>
>Yours seems to have an extra directory in it?  I don’t have /IBM/ in mine.
>
>BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY
>HFS FILE /Service/usr/lpp/tcpip/lib/nls/msg/C/IBM/EZAMLCAT.
>
>BPXF170E RETURN CODE 00000081, REASON CODE 0594003D. A SYMLINK FAILED FOR
>LINK NAME /Service/usr/lpp/tcpip/lib/nls/msg/C/IBM/../../
>
>../../../../../...
>

Correction.   I just went and looked at the actual filesystem

-rw-r--r--   2 BPXROOT  OMVSGRP      699 Sep 25  2019 EZAITMSG        
-rw-r--r--   2 BPXROOT  OMVSGRP    26230 Dec 23  2019 EZAMLCAT        
-rw-r--r--   2 BPXROOT  OMVSGRP     5026 Sep 25  2019 EZAMLRPY        
TEC1:$ pwd                                        
/RST01A/usr/lpp/tcpip/lib/nls/msg/C/IBM           
TEC1:$                                            

My apologies for the red herring.   I'd still ask IBM to investigate a possible 
packaging error though since it appears to be an APARfix

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to