I was planning to override an existing INCLUDE for a common set of STEPLIB files, but for different programs. I was hoping I wouldn't have to make a lot of changes to the JCL just for this simple test I am running. Billy
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, John McKown <[email protected]>wrote: > I haven't seen any syntax to do that. Why not use a instream PROC? You can > now nest a PROC within another PROC, so you could use an instream PROC much > like an instream INCLUDE. > > //INSTREAM PROC > //STEP EXEC PGM=WANDA > //DD1 > // PEND > // EXEC PROC=EXTPROC,IPROC=INSTREAM > // > > //EXTPROC PROC IPROC= > // EXEC PROC=&IPROC > //* OTHER JCL IN EXTERNAL PROC IN PROCLIB > //* > > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Bill Ashton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Does anyone know if I can create an instream entry that would be used as > an > > INCLUDE? I have a bunch of steps in this job I am running, and would like > > to override the INCLUDE member being called by coding it instream in the > > top of the job, just as you would do with an instream PROC. I don't want > to > > change the JCLLIB, as it is pretty complex already. > > > > Thanks! > > *Billy Ashton* > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > > > -- > This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an > actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- Thank you and best regards, *Billy Ashton* ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
