Bill,

Youre barking up the wrong tree man. Most banks dont run their own DDA
(demand deposit accounting) applications these days.

Most of them use a service provider ... like Jack Henry...
https://www.jackhenrybanking.com/core-solutions/pages/cif-2020.aspx?__hstc=252117398.ee51269a9c40b203bbef53ca208aa325.1639265144977.1639265144977.1639265144977.1&__hssc=252117398.1.1639265144977&__hsfp=2849849003

Joe

On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 4:03 PM Bill Johnson <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Not in my wallet. How did they like the AWS outage? I looked at their
> Facebook page. Looks like a bunch of unhappy customers. 1 bank out of the
> top 100. Impressive.
>
>
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
>
>
> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 4:55 PM, Clark Morris <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 11/12/2021 at 4:33 pm, Bill Johnson  wrote:
> > Banks will never do what’s economical at the expense of risk.
> > Mitigating risk is what banks do. The mainframe continues to get MORE
> > ECONOMICAL, safer, more uptime, faster. The clouds have been around
> > for a decade or more and how many banks have transitioned to the
> > public cloud from a mainframe?
> >
>
> Capital One?
> Clark Morris
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 3:10 PM, Tom Brennan
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > And that's where we disagree.  Banks will do whatever is most
> > economical
> > that still meets their needs.  If x86-cloud doesn't meet those
> > requirements today, they stay on the mainframe.  Tomorrow... only the
> > shadow knows.
> >
> > People say OS/2 was far better in design, operation, and security than
> > Windows, but it's gone now.  Sometimes the "best" system is simply
> > what
> > everybody else is using.  Got to go now because I just put in a
> > betamax.
> >
> > On 12/11/2021 10:51 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you put your DR placement right across the street from your data
> >> center? Consolidation is bad. Exposure for everyone in the same place
> >> is a disaster waiting to happen. Like last week. It’s why truly
> >> important functions like banks don’t do clouds.
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >>
> >>
> >> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 1:46 PM, Tom Brennan
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Of course... military has the money (the $500 hammer?) to have
> >> redundancy on their redundancy.  Business installations normally can't
> >> justify those costs.
> >>
> >> However, I think if we looked close we both might be surprised at all
> >> the various baskets AWS has behind the scenes.  But like any basket
> >> collection, there are always single points of failure.
> >>
> >> On 12/11/2021 6:06 AM, Bill Johnson wrote:
> >>>
> >>> You’ve just described what the mainframe does for an organization.
> >>> But, I don’t want every organization to have its eggs in one basket
> >>> any more than I want every nuclear weapon in one silo.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Saturday, December 11, 2021, 2:01 AM, Tom Brennan
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I don't agree (surprise!) I've always advocated putting all your eggs
> >>> in
> >>> one basket, and then taking really good care of that basket with
> >>> backups, DR, procedures, dual this, dual that, etc.
> >>>
> >>> On 12/10/2021 5:55 PM, Bill Johnson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This paragraph concerns me.
> >>>> One of the founding principles of the early Internet design was
> >>>> decentralization – by design, a single fault would not be able to
> >>>> take out everything. In a way, today’s reliance on large cloud
> >>>> providers removes the benefits of decentralization; we rely on the
> >>>> scalability, cost effectiveness, and flexibility of today’s SaaS and
> >>>> Cloud offerings yet we are potentially putting all of our eggs into
> >>>> one basket. This same statement applies to CDNs, as seen with the
> >>>> recent Akamai outage from this past summer.
> >>>> This was one of the drawbacks we experienced when our GM subsidiary
> >>>> (and all GM subsidiaries eventually) combined into EDS data centers.
> >>>> Charlotte was where ours was located. If the mainframe went down in
> >>>> Charlotte, multiple GM subsidiaries were screwed. Costing GM tens of
> >>>> millions in highly paid union labor twiddling their thumbs.
> >>>> If an ETSY business owner selling crocheted scarves has a 4 hour
> >>>> outage, it’s probably not that bad. If an auto plant, bank or
> >>>> brokerage, health care provider, insurance company, or airline is
> down
> >>>> for 4 hours, it could be disastrous.
> >>>> Clouds aren’t all they’re cracked up to be.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Friday, December 10, 2021, 8:00 PM, Mark Regan
> >>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Since this topic is still somewhat active, I thought I'd forward this
> >>>> link.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.thousandeyes.com/blog/aws-outage-analysis-dec-7-2021
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Mark Regan, K8MTR, EN80tg
> >>>> CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1979 active; 1979-1991, reserves; including
> >>>> two
> >>>> years with the Ohio Air National Guard)
> >>>> Nationwide Insurance, Retired, 1986-2017 (z/OS Network Software
> >>>> Consultant)
> >>>> Email:        [email protected]
> >>>> LinkedIn:  https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-t-regan
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >>>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO
> IBM-MAIN
> >>>> .
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >>> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>> .
> >>>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >> .
> >>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to