No, I meant execute, as in *either* EX or EXRL, a TM. I was, of course,
assuming that TMY was not necessary and that TMHH, TMHL, TMLH and TMLL were
useless for the purpose.
"I meant what I sad and I said what I meant,
A sysprog is faithful, 100%"
Horton Hears an IPL by Dr. Seus
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [[email protected]] on behalf of
Robin Vowels [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 3:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Replacement for TM instruction
----- Original Message -----
From: "Seymour J Metz" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 12:56 AM
For a test of a single bit you can do a logical and on a copy of the byte or
use NRK.
For testing multiple bits you can execute a TM.
You mean, EXexute a TM.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
