Maybe "z/OS security provisions are better than Windows security provisions -- but you still have to employ them".
--- Bob Bridges, [email protected], cell 336 382-7313 /* Home is not where you live, but where they understand you. -Christian Morgenstern */ -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Radoslaw Skorupka Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 04:41 It is possible to steal money from a tent or chalet. It is possible to steal money from bank safe. However it does NOT mean there is no security difference between tent and safe. Yes, z/OS *IS BETTER THAN WINDOWS IN TERM OF SECURITY*. It doesn't mean it's bulletproof, but it is better. --- W dniu 21.12.2021 o 20:27, Erik Janssen pisze: > The article itself may contain some errors and misunderstandings, but the > conclusion is absolutely spot on. Some people still maintain the idea that > z/OS is better that linux and even windows in terms of security. Sadly, this > believe and lack of urgency means that all z/OS shops that are not recent on > their maintenance today are running with zero day exploits in APF authorized > routines that leave them extremely vulnerable. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
