On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:09:16 -0500, Ed Gould wrote: >I think you are reading too much into John's presentation.
I don't think he is. >After thinking about it I would guess that the exec statement and >parm will remain essentially the same and if you want to pass a >longer parm then you would code the exec pgm=a,parmdd= .......... That's what it says. No need to guess. >if an old program would look it would get a 0 then however IBM sees >fit to pass the new string that would be the rule for long fields. How do you get that impression from reading what is in John's presentation? "No other changes required for unauthorized programs" -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
