The find command -exec option requires that the list of tokens following it are 
terminated by a semicolon.
The backslash is an escape that prevents the shell from interpreting the 
semicolon as a meta character (end of command).

See: 
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.1.0?topic=descriptions-find-find-file-meeting-specified-criteria


On Mon, Jan 24, 2022, at 3:59 PM, Dave Barry wrote:
> Is it possible the "\" is taken as an escape character?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
> ITschak Mugzach
> Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2022 7:08 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Chaining unix commands
> 
> CAUTION! This email originated outside of the organization. Please do not 
> open attachments or click links from an unknown or suspicious origin.
> 
> ======================================================================
> I am trying to chain some commands by using a primary command -exec 
> subcommand1; subcommand2; \;
> 
> for some reason, uss doesn't see the ending (slashed) semicolon. In order to 
> ignore the confusion, I also tried primary command -exec subcommand1 && 
> subcommand2 && ... &&\; with no success. Any ideas?
> 
> ITschak Mugzach
> *|** IronSphere Platform* *|* *Information Security Continuous Monitoring for 
> z/OS, x/Linux & IBM I **| z/VM coming soon  *
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
> [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> 

Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to