Classification: Confidential

JES2 (for several years now) has offered the option of allowing duplicate names 
to run concurrently.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of 
Charles Mills
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 4:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: JES2 DUPL_JOB parameter

[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the 
sender, Don’t click links or open attachments as it may be a Phishing email, 
which can steal your Information and compromise your Computer.]

Certainly everything you need to know is in SMF 30. You can tell when a Job 
arrives in JES, when it gets initiated, and when it finishes. It would be an 
interesting programming exercise to model z/OS behavior and compute duplicate 
job delay.

It seems to me -- with the caveat that I am not an expert in JES2 job selection 
-- that it might not be black and white? Couldn't a job come into the system 
and be held as a duplicate. Then the other job finishes but now there is no 
initiator of the right class. And then an initiator frees up but now there is a 
new duplicate running. So ... how much of that delay is due to duplicate 
jobnames? (Or as I say, perhaps I do not know how job selection
works.)

SMF30HQT 4 binary Time following job preparation when the job was ineligible 
for execution for reasons not included in SMF30RQT. This includes job hold, job 
class hold, job queue hold, duplicate jobname serialization, and job class 
execution limits. If the JOB statement specified TYPRUN=HOLD, the time that the 
job is held for this reason is not included. The time is in 1024-microsecond 
units.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2022 11:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: JES2 DUPL_JOB parameter

I've long (ever since we started our migration from VSE to z/OS in 2008) 
disliked the default of DUPL_JOB=DELAY, but I was overridden in setting NODELAY 
because of the "it's always been this way" attitude, and lack of desire to 
determine if there were any dependencies on the behavior.

I am curious (but not hopeful) if there is anything available to log or 
otherwise note when a job is delayed because it has the same name as a job that 
is already running.  Specifically, I am looking to find processes that depend 
on the DELAY behavior.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
::DISCLAIMER::
________________________________
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only. E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be 
secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. 
The e mail and its contents (with or without referred errors) shall therefore 
not attach any liability on the originator or HCL or its affiliates. Views or 
opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the author and 
may not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any 
form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification, 
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have 
received this email in error please delete it and notify the sender 
immediately. Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for 
viruses and other defects.
________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to