Thanks Brian for the sanity check, I'm going to assume the APF entry was
added because my predecessor was not sure, so added it to be safe, this
is now causing headaches for audit issues. removing the entry will check
off an audit to-do for me
Carmen
On 4/29/2022 2:31 AM, Brian Westerman wrote:
The alias name is not valid to z/OS processing for APF. It's in the manual
somewhere. The alias name is jsut a catalog construct, it doesn't physically
exist on DISK anywhere.
Brian
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
--
/I am not bound to win, but I am bound to be true. I am not bound to
succeed, but I am bound to live by the light that I have. I must stand
with anybody that stands right, and stand with him while he is right,
and part with him when he goes wrong. *Abraham Lincoln*/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
