Hmm ... Sounds like IOF's ARChive command.
On 2022-05-02 08:07, Lionel B. Dyck wrote:
Kirk - I know of no way to add a descriptor record separating each DD when
extracting multiple DD's using SDSF to a single target dataset.
That does look to be a useful feature - you should submit an RFE for it.
Lionel B. Dyck <><
Website:
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lbdsoftware.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5ccf5655756a4821aaef08da2c3473cc%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637870901067728957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UIcJb7Uiot%2FFyPyKKgCJXsT3V8hBkIc11HjVmtl4lCY%3D&reserved=0
Github:
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flbdyck&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5ccf5655756a4821aaef08da2c3473cc%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637870901067728957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lr9l1fHuZQk5S0LQyjR1fIymlUGQEFd%2Fdq53%2FV2gNYI%3D&reserved=0
"Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are." - - - John Wooden
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
Kirk Wolf
Sent: Monday, May 2, 2022 06:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SDSF - ISPF questions (wishes?)
I'm sorry if I was not clear. I was looking for something that used
standard SDSF commands and does not require that a client have some REXX
code of any kind. It's more about the usage context rather than anything
pejorative about REXX.
On Sun, May 1, 2022, at 6:30 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2022 23:00:39 +0000, Gibney, Dave wrote:
I do not believe there is any z/OS system without Rexx available.
Pretty sure there is no such thing as a z/OS install without Rexx
I misunderstood you to say that there is no installation procedure on
z/OS that does not depend on Rexx.
And the page cited by LBD,
<https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Flbdyck%2Fsdsfxdd&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5ccf5655756a4821aaef08da2c3473cc%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637870901067728957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k2cw%2F%2FNz7Ln3wN3jbrM15OVUWuNlEBs1CXOSSgEWYwo%3D&reserved=0>,
includes "install.rex".
".rex"? I always spell it ".Rexx". Keystroke parsimonious?
???
But there were installers for MVS long before Rexx infiltrated TSO/E.
A classic example is SMP/E, which IBM deemed safe until Spring,
2010.
--
gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdovetail.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7C5ccf5655756a4821aaef08da2c3473cc%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637870901067728957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UoAk4htlvqpP2IvQHEEbYE5p0qXylkrGGVRN5UpV2gE%3D&reserved=0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
