In
<caajsdjgzupa4xvctgir+ajeb9muauso2tgedwc7fpoo_5oo...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 04/07/2013
at 07:06 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>I agree will Gil. I know it is likely too late to get it changed, but
>I disagree that being ISPF "compatible" is desirable. ISPF edit was
>designed for program coding.
The ISPF/PDF editor was designed for editing sequential files,
including job streams.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
