On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 13:29:02 -0500, John McKown wrote: >I think the reason that PARM remains as-is and the new PARMDD implemented >is due to the format of JCL internal text. Internal text allows for a >maximum length of 255 . Which explains why the value of PATH on a DD is a >max of 255 characters. > But why does BPXWDYN which presumably doesnt go through JCL internal text enforce the same limit? Does it just not want to humiliate JCL?
Isn't the count field on a DYNALLOC TU 16 bits? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
