The tso/ispf one. I have not seen the zosmf one yet. Jack
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022, 05:21 Timothy Sipples <[email protected]> wrote: > Jack Zukt wrote: > >Between those three, I would say that rmm has an unfriendly user > interface, > >but I suppose that is just the IBM way. I really liked Control-M ease of > >use. CA1 was, and I am sure it still is, a great product, and the > >transition to Control-My was easy to do. The transition to rmm was more > >painful due to the user interface not being very intuitive. > > Which user interface? There are at least 3 of them, and one of them is > quite new. z/OS DFSMSrmm started offering a z/OS Management Facility > plug-in fairly recently, and it’s seen some improvements already. Here’s a > tour (circa July, 2020): > > https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/system/files/inline-files/edgdoc.pdf > > — — — — — > Timothy Sipples > Senior Architect > Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cybersecurity > IBM zSystems/LinuxONE, Asia-Pacific > [email protected] > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
