I'll correct my earlier misstatement. You did not say you were the client; merely "-n-house".
On Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:41:25 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >The ECB is not in the Rexx. It is in MVS-owned storage IIRC. > I believe ECBs routinely occupy user-owned storage. >-----Original Message----- >> ... >>... Well, the actual parameter passed by the Rexx is continuously accessible >>to the Assembler. It is of course possible to access any Rexx variable from >>assembler, but I see no need. If I understand your question, the answer is No. >> I took "continuously accessible" to mean accessible by concurrent tasks even after the Assembler returns to Rexx. >That depends on the AFAIK undocumented behavior of Rexx storage >management. What happens if Rexx compacts variable storage, thereby >moving an ECB? Rexx spurns concurrency. > "ECB" for example. The Devil's advocate was envisioning using the parameter passed by Rexx as working storage. Which is OK until returning to Rexx. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
