I worked for a major university in NE Ohio that had a written DR plan that didn’t include an actual offsite contract/plan to bring up a usable mainframe during an actual disaster. Because of cost. That was mid 90’s and they no longer have a mainframe. I think it was pretty common back then. It was at the universities in Ohio who were part of the consortium.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Wednesday, July 27, 2022, 1:13 AM, Timothy Sipples <[email protected]> wrote: I have absolutely no information about this incident other than what the media are reporting. I wish everyone involved the best success. My *personal* curiosity revolves around the Disaster Recovery plan and resources. As I'm sure we all know the standard/typical operational practice is to have an alternate site, separated at some distance, equipped with standby resources. Disk subsystems replicate between sites (primary to alternate) either synchronously or asynchronously. Or at least there'd be a remote tape library, preferably virtual to some degree (for performance reasons), preferably with multiple incremental backups per day. If the primary site is lost, for whatever reason(s), the IT operations team restores at least critical services from the alternate site. It might be a long RTO (24 hours for example) if it's a basic/entry DR arrangement, but it'd be something. Over many years I've only ever worked with two clients that had no real DR plan and essentially no DR resources when I first met them. As it happens they were both government agencies, but they were also both located in fairly poor or poorer developing countries. One client took frequent tape backups and shuttled physical tapes off-site so at least they'd be able to recover to some point, eventually. (RTO="a week or two," RPO=12+ hours probably.) I wasn't happy they had to operate that way, but their constraints were genuine. I worked with the other government agency to eliminate their exposure within a tight budget, and they now have an alternate site with a reasonable DR capability. I also remember working with another customer in a developing country, a bank. They were upgrading their systems, and their original plan involved losing DR protections for a couple days (about 48 hours) as I recall. That plan troubled me, so I worked with them to create a better, safer plan that preserved DR coverage throughout the upgrade project. They chose the revised plan. They completed their upgrade project on-time, within budget, and without incident. So what happened to the alternate site (and DR switchover to it)? — — — — — Timothy Sipples Senior Architect Digital Assets, Industry Solutions, and Cybersecurity IBM zSystems/LinuxONE, Asia-Pacific [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
