> No -wait - it looks as though EPNAME supports > an RS address on the MF=E form.
Look again. It doesn't. But it does support address-in-register of the name. The only "rant" in this subject area that is likely to be addressed is the fact that the syntax diagram for EPNAME for MF=E is incorrect in saying "symbol". That is correct for the standard and list forms but not for the execute form. The only specification for SVCUPDTE's EPNAME on MF=E is (n) with register n (reg 2-12) containing the address of the 8-character name. I will get that corrected. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
