Take a look at your ISFPRMxx or equivalent setting in your security product for SDSF authorization.
Specifically the group you belong to, the IDSP and DEST settings and the DSPAUTH setting. CIT | Ken Porowski | VP Mainframe Engineering | Information Technology | +1 973 740 5459 (tel) | [email protected] This email message and any accompanying materials may contain proprietary, privileged and confidential information of CIT Group Inc. or its subsidiaries or affiliates (collectively, "CIT"), and are intended solely for the recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any use, disclosure, printing, copying or distribution, or reliance on the contents, of this communication is strictly prohibited. CIT disclaims any liability for the review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or the taking of any action in reliance upon, this communication by persons other than the intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please reply to the sender advising of the error in transmission, and immediately delete and destroy the communication and any accompanying materials. To the extent permitted by applicable law, CIT and others may inspect, review, monitor, analyze, copy, record and retain any communications sent from or received at this email address. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of EXT-Schwarz, Barry Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Strange response to SDSF PREFIX command The DEST field makes sense (the value matches). I will have to check but I don't think IDTF is active on our system unless it defaults so. Nor have we ever knowingly done anything to authorize a user access to netmail. But now I have somewhere to start looking. Thank you. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Vernooij, CP - SPLXM > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 6:52 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Strange response to SDSF PREFIX command > > Interesting enough to make me go search. > For a change I jumped to RTFMing with PF1 and it shows: > > Purpose: Limit the jobs that are displayed by job name. > (In some cases, this involves columns other than JOBNAME. > See the note at the end of this topic.) ... > With the PREFIX command, two additional columns may be used. > For jobs that entered the system through the TSO/E Interactive Data > Transmission Facility (netmail), SDSF compares the value for the > PREFIX command with a value that is displayed in the Wtr column > (output external writer name) or as part of the Dest column (JES print > destination name). > > Does this help? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
